Implementing AI without a strategy is like buying a plane without a pilot
· Nikola Totukhov - Invisio Agency

AI is not magic. But the wrong consultant often promises just that!
Nikola,
please introduce yourself in a few words. What is your professional path and how did you come up
with the idea to create Invisio?
The idea for Invisio was
born partly out of necessity. After the birth of our twins, my free time
sharply decreased, and I started actively looking for ways to do more work in
less time. I came across a video on YouTube explaining how Google
Sheets can be connected to AI to automate a given task, and this
was back when ChatGPT was still in version 3.5. At that time, I was working
at a product company, and thanks to such automations, I was able to
complete my monthly work in just four working days. By the end of 2024,
the company went bankrupt, and finding a new position proved to be extremely difficult, and
Invisio was born as a logical continuation.

How does
Invisio differ from the dozens of companies that today offer AI services and
consultations?
In
recent months, we have noticed a trend of more companies turning to
us after being dissatisfied with their work with other AI
consulting agencies and seeking help to solve more complex business
problems. In this regard, I suppose that what makes us better than the others is that once we
commit to something, we do not leave it until the client is satisfied, and that we never
sell hype, but only working solutions for the business.
You often talk
about personalized AI solutions rather than universal tools. Why do you think
the “one tool for all” approach rarely works in real business?
From the very beginning
of the company, we had the opportunity to work with large companies that have
many daily interactions woven into complex business processes, and this
helped us grow so quickly and to such a level. Observing how
large companies manage their volume and processes, we see that even when
universal (SaaS) tools exist, every business has specific needs
that the standard solution simply does not fully meet. That's why
the need for a personalized AI approach is crucial, especially when
working with larger organizations.
What are
the most common problems companies come to you with when seeking AI
optimization?
We have built
a strong reputation in developing specialized solutions for the e-commerce
industry, and the majority of inquiries we receive are indeed in
this direction.
Currently, our team
is working on consolidating all our agents into a unified ERP system, which
we plan to provide completely free of charge, so that more brands can
access basic ERP functionalities without payment, while the use of
the agents in the system will be paid, but on a dynamic basis - according to
the frequency of use of the respective tool.

What are
the signals that a company is truly ready to begin AI transformation,
and not just following the latest technological trend?
The answer is
relatively simple, and I share it with every client: well-structured
information, easily accessible to every employee, is processed quickly and easily by AI
and can be built upon sustainably. Conversely, if conversations with clients
exist solely in the mind of one employee, and fuel invoices are scattered
in folders on someone’s personal computer, then there is no good foundation on
which to build an AI transformation.
Many
organizations hesitate whether to hire an AI manager in-house or to use
an external partner. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches?
This
trend is also observed abroad. We increasingly see open positions for
CAIO (Chief AI Officer). In my opinion, smaller companies have a greater real
need for a Data or Security Engineering role to ensure proper
management and protection of the data flow than for a hired AI manager.
The reason is simple: a large part of what is currently offered on the market
is hype. The models have already mastered the basic mathematical formulas and systems
more than a year ago. From here on, development focuses on
optimization, more accurate results, and lower costs. Every major announcement is practically
marketing aimed at increasing the value of the producing companies. The truth
is that for most business tasks, a complex or expensive AI
model is not needed, nor tools built around hype. Properly structured data
and well-defined workflows yield much better business results.
For what type
of companies does it make sense to build an internal AI team, and when is it
more reasonable to rely on external expertise?
In my opinion, a serious internal team is needed for companies
that work with extremely sensitive information and want to ensure it does not leave
the organization’s perimeter. These companies usually have a strong
Security team and pay great attention to Compliance.
We had a case
where a large German logistics partner with its own AI department turned to
us to solve a complex problem. We live in a time when knowledge is
spreading extremely quickly, but it is practically impossible to track
all the new solutions that appear daily. Therefore, the symbiosis
between external consultants and internal teams is extremely important.
Very often,
the internal team of a given company misses something that an external consultant
notices almost immediately.

What mistakes
are companies most often making when choosing an AI strategy?
They follow the hype
and constantly change systems instead of building stable processes on which
the models can actually work in favor of their team.
What can
happen if an organization invests in an inappropriate solution, the wrong
consultant, or technology that does not meet its real needs?
42% of AI projects in the last two years have been
stopped for this reason - a poor solution for automating the wrong
work process. In such cases, the work of both consultants and
internal teams risks being wasted. We often observe companies that
come to us with a real and significant problem requiring automation, but upon
a more in-depth analysis, it turns out that the costs for AI exceed the price of
performing the same task by a person, or the risk of error and damage to the company’s reputation is very high. Many consultants keep this fact quiet to
win the project. At Invisio, we believe that the success of the client is a priority,
so we warn in advance about all possible risks.
I remember a
case where a client told me: “It seems you don’t particularly like AI, you speak
quite skeptically about it.”
“I would say that
I’m not so much skeptical as realistic.” - I replied.
Have you seen
cases where companies have spent significant budgets on AI without receiving
real returns? What were the reasons?
There have been instances where a client came to us deeply disappointed
with a previous experience with competitors. To the extent that they refused to pay until they saw
results. This is completely understandable. The hype around the technology is so
great that even I, when I started the company, expected quick, almost
magical results. In the course of our work, we have encountered the real
limitations of the technology more than once, and this has made us much more careful in
the promises we make and more consistent in the warnings we give to our clients from the very beginning.
Which processes
are most often subject to successful optimization through artificial intelligence?
We have numerous successful cases in the history of the company, but
in about 90% of them, AI performs best in classifying data by several
criteria. When the criteria are well defined, and the incoming data
is consistent, we observe errors on the order of 1 in 40,000 processed
queries.
In which business
functions does AI bring the fastest and measurable returns – sales, marketing,
customer service, administration, human resources, or other areas?
We have developed solutions for almost all the listed
areas, but administration, finance, and accounting, as well as
customer service, lead in terms of fast and measurable returns.
Marketing, on the other hand, remains the most creative and most difficult to
automate area.
How can a
company assess whether its AI project is successful and what metrics should
it monitor?
We primarily monitor three metrics for every project we
develop.
For each
automation, we measure the execution time and compare it with the time
needed for a person to perform the same task. This way, we understand how much time has been saved. Over time, we have also established
other important criteria, such as optimizing costs for AI usage and whether
the system requires constant maintenance, dependent on multiple other systems.
These factors can significantly increase the cost of a given process, and in some
cases even necessitate limiting or stopping it.
Trust is a
key factor in such projects. How is trust built between a company and
an external AI team when the parties are just starting to work together?
We approach every new project as if it were our own
to the extent that sometimes we ask ourselves how we manage to achieve such good
results for our clients, while we rarely find time to apply the same approach to
our own processes. Most of our clients appreciate the fact that
we provide 24/7 support for the systems we build.
How do you
overcome the natural concerns of managers regarding data security,
confidentiality, and control over processes?
This is a frequently asked question, and we approach very carefully
when choosing suppliers to ensure peace of mind for every client. Recently,
we had a case where we had to store data for no more than six
working days, after which the information was encrypted and remained accessible
only to AI upon request, but not to a person. In this way, we guarantee
the security of our clients' data.
How long
does it usually take for a company to see the first real results from
AI optimization?
It depends on the size of the company and the number of operations
performed by the respective department. When starting work with a new client, we always
strive first to optimize the most frequently performed process in the company. This
way, we ensure quick and tangible returns. The so-called (quick
wins) are usually visible within the first month and a half.
Is using
external AI services an expensive pleasure, and what are the most common myths
about the cost of such projects?
I have heard a number of alarming stories about abuses by colleagues in
the industry, and probably that’s why people approach every new AI
implementation cautiously. What I can share with your audience is the following:
Every AI
project is software development done ten times faster than before. Logically, it should also be ten times
cheaper, as it is significantly more accessible. This applies to the actual time for
development, but it does not mean that communication and accompanying processes in
providing the service become cheaper to the same extent.
It is also important to
note that when planning a budget for development, it is good to allocate a
line for maintenance, as fine-tuning the system also requires time
and resources.
What is
the profile of the companies that Invisio works with most often?
We most often work
with companies in the wholesale, retail, and e-commerce sectors. We have built strong
systems that save significant time, and often save money from
errors thanks to timely detection and quick informed decision-making.
Are there
industries where AI optimization brings particularly high value and why?
Without sounding alarming, I believe that the accounting industry
has the potential to be almost entirely automated, with minimal need for human
intervention.
Let’s talk
about the training you conduct for business leaders. What is its main goal?
“AI for Business Leaders” is a training program we recently launched,
because we notice a serious gap between the hype and reality in
applying AI in business. Many companies approach fearfully, invest in
random directions, and spend significant amounts on tools and promises that
do not deliver real value. My approach is that complex engineering solutions
are actually the simplest, and we always strive to find a quick and easy way to
solve complex client problems.
What are
the most common questions you receive from owners and executives
during these trainings?
We most often receive questions driven by surprise -
the participants in our workshop often react with the words: “Does it really
work that easily?”
What knowledge and
skills should a modern leader possess to make the right decisions
regarding the implementation of AI in their organization?
The most important decision for the modern leader remains the same
for years: to build a team of talents whose knowledge and skills will allow the
business to develop sustainably with the help of AI. There is no more valuable asset than
a qualified expert workforce.
In your opinion, which
companies will be the winners of the AI revolution in the next five years?
Those that manage to build a strong team of experts, as
I mentioned above, and who have the persistence to keep their database
organized, up-to-date, and well-structured.
One of
the most discussed questions is whether AI will take jobs. What is your
view on the topic?
If we look historically, I do not know of a case where a person
can dig faster, more accurately, and more tirelessly than a tractor. In the same way, people
whose work is based on repetitive but strictly logical processes are
exactly those who, in my opinion, have an urgent need to develop new skills. But
as we have already discussed, AI does not have consciousness, and that will remain the biggest
advantage of humans. Creative work and critical thinking will remain
irreplaceable.
Which professions
are most at risk of automation and which will become even more valuable thanks to
AI?
I have thought seriously about this issue and do not claim to have
a categorical answer, but in my opinion, the accounting profession is among the easiest to
automate. If you are an accountant and reading this interview, I would advise you
to develop your skills towards consulting clients, rather than just in
processing their documents. Otherwise, your business will gradually start to
lose ground.
As for
professions that will retain or increase their value, I believe that people with
serious expertise, long-term experience, and a willingness to take on greater risks
will be valued more and more. The reason is that AI is extremely effective in
repeating the same process millions of times, but in marketing and sales,
it is invariably the more creative and innovative thinkers who win.
What is the role
of humans in a future where more and more tasks will be performed by
intelligent systems?
Since the birth of our twins, my free time has decreased
significantly, and probably that was the turning point that directed me towards
automating my daily life, so I could spend more time with
the most important people in my life. I believe that AI is here to help us spend
more time with the people around us, and that this technology will be one of
the last major innovations that will actually bring people closer together, rather than
separate them.
How do you
see the development of AI in Bulgaria over the next few years, and is the
Bulgarian business ready for this transformation?
I consider myself a patriot and believe that our country has serious
potential for development in the field of AI at a global level. The successes of INSAIT
are probably known to a large part of your readers, but if you have not yet
familiarized yourself with them, I highly recommend doing so.
As for
the readiness of the Bulgarian business, I believe it is still not fully ready, and
that is exactly why we organized the training “AI for Business Leaders”: so that
more companies can adopt our methodology for successful AI implementation.
My ultimate goal is
to help a sufficient number of businesses so that Bulgaria becomes a
recognizable leader on the world map in terms of AI Native companies.
If today an
executive director tells you: “I receive ten proposals a week for AI,
but I don’t know where to start,” what would be the first advice you would give him?
In our workshop “AI for Business Leaders,” we dedicate
a significant part of the time to how companies can recognize unrealistic
AI promises. We have our own matrix for evaluating such
proposals, which allows us to assess how adequate they are or if they are simply
bolstered by promises of a universal solution to many problems. I would be happy to
provide access to this matrix to any reader of CareerDailyNews,
who contacts me.
And finally – how
can companies contact you for consultation, analysis, or implementation of
AI solutions, and to which email can they send their inquiries?
The website where you can find more information about
our company is invisio.agency, and the email where you can contact
me and my team is